IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251339461.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Study of Risk Communication and Perceptions of Official and Public Agendas in the Context of Emergencies: Based on the Itaewon Stampede

Author

Listed:
  • Yanchun Chen
  • Gaogao Peng
  • Yuwei Tu
  • Tianzhi Ren

Abstract

On October 29, 2022, a large-scale stampede occurred in Seoul, South Korea, which caused worldwide shock and garnered global attention and discussion. In this article, a study on the thematic characteristics of social media platforms during major sudden risk events is carried out utilizing online agenda setting. Furthermore, the consensus and divergence between the official and public agendas in risk communication are analyzed to understand their interactive relationship. The study reveals that the risk communication of the stampede comprises seven core issues across three stages, including risk information, warnings, preparedness, uncertainty reduction, utility, assurance, and public risk perception. These findings offer insights for media coverage to focus on critical aspects, assist the government in conducting effective administration and risk communication, and provide empirical evidence for the agenda-setting in the field of sudden safety accidents within the online realm, aiming to complement current academic research.

Suggested Citation

  • Yanchun Chen & Gaogao Peng & Yuwei Tu & Tianzhi Ren, 2025. "A Study of Risk Communication and Perceptions of Official and Public Agendas in the Context of Emergencies: Based on the Itaewon Stampede," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251339461
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251339461
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251339461
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251339461?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251339461. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.