IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251339112.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Perceptions of Community Empowerment Among Resettlement Community Stakeholders in China: A Grounded Theory Study

Author

Listed:
  • Dongdong Wang
  • Jiaying An
  • Sheng Sun

Abstract

Empowerment, a widely-used approach to community governance in Western societies, has recently attracted attention in China. This study aims to investigate whether empowerment can effectively enhance Chinese resettlement community governance. Using grounded theory, the conceptual framework of community stakeholders’ perspectives on empowerment implementation was developed. Interviews were conducted with a total of 14 participants, which included community residents, government workers, and other relevant individuals through purposeful sampling. Additionally, six community residents were selected for a focus group discussion through theoretical sampling to validate the findings. Data extraction and coding were carried out by team members independently, leading to the identification of two distinct evaluation themes: (1) a positive impact on community governance, which includes promoting community participation among residents, particularly the elderly, improving community happiness, and enhancing community relations; and (2) a negative effect on community governance, such as exacerbating community inequality and causing confusion in community management. The findings indicate that Chinese resettlement communities may face challenges in implementing community empowerment, but also possess unique strengths. Suggestions for improvement in China and potential strategies for Western societies to enhance their empowerment approaches can be derived from this study.

Suggested Citation

  • Dongdong Wang & Jiaying An & Sheng Sun, 2025. "Perceptions of Community Empowerment Among Resettlement Community Stakeholders in China: A Grounded Theory Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251339112
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251339112
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251339112
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251339112?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251339112. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.