IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251336696.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Multiple Paths for Driving Environmental Sustainability Orientation from the Perspective of Configuration

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Li
  • Yanli Zhang
  • Wenxin Zhang
  • Kun Chen

Abstract

Environmental sustainability orientation (ESO) is critical to leading sustainable business practices, so it has become a promising and attractive topic for green sustainable development. However, how to coordinate the forces of government, consumers, competitors, and managers to drive firms to adopt ESO is an important theoretical and practical issue to be further studied. Based on stakeholder theory, we develop a configurational framework and propose that high ESO is contingent upon the coordination among perceived policy pressure, consumer pressure, competitive pressure, and manager commitment. By using fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) in 127 cases, we reveal that single antecedent condition of stakeholder is difficult to form high ESO and identify them into three different pathways. The results further indicate that there is an asymmetric relationship between the three high ESO paths and the two non-high ESO paths, that is, the relationship between “high ESO†and “non-high ESO†is not either/or. The study highlights the theoretical significance of ESO based on the configuration of multiple antecedents among different stakeholders, which makes up the gap of the traditional statistical analysis on the interpretation of ESO. We also provide implications for the government and enterprises to promote the formation of ESO.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Li & Yanli Zhang & Wenxin Zhang & Kun Chen, 2025. "Multiple Paths for Driving Environmental Sustainability Orientation from the Perspective of Configuration," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251336696
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251336696
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251336696
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251336696?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251336696. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.