IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251336575.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Influence of Learning Strategies on Students’ Learning Motivation, Engagement, and Academic Performance in the Context of Online Flipped Teaching

Author

Listed:
  • Wu Juan
  • Wu Lei
  • Yuan Huanhuan
  • Yang Dongfang

Abstract

This study elucidates how information processing and self-questioning strategies are used in the context of online flipped teaching. A 6-week quasi experimental study was conducted to investigate online flipped teaching with the goal of exploring the impacts of two learning strategies, that is, annotation-summarizing-questioning (ASQ) and concept mapping-questioning (CMQ), on college students’ online learning motivation, learning engagement, and academic achievement. A total of 36 third-year undergraduate students participated in this study. The findings of this research indicated that while these two strategies did not have significant effects on students’ learning motivation or overall performance in terms of learning engagement, they could improve students’ emotional engagement. Additionally, students who used the ASQ strategy exhibited significantly improved cognitive engagement, and their academic performance was significantly better than that of students who used the CMQ strategy. Both strategies can enhance students’ engagement in the context of online flipped learning, but the ASQ strategy is more effective in promoting academic performance. This study, which is of considerable significance, highlights the learning strategies that influence engagement and academic performance in higher education online learning, and outlines the operational experience for online flipped teaching. Future research directions are also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Wu Juan & Wu Lei & Yuan Huanhuan & Yang Dongfang, 2025. "The Influence of Learning Strategies on Students’ Learning Motivation, Engagement, and Academic Performance in the Context of Online Flipped Teaching," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251336575
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251336575
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251336575
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251336575?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251336575. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.