IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251334545.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Teachers and Learners’ Perceptions about Implementation of AI Tools in Elementary Mathematics Classes

Author

Listed:
  • Xuejing Song
  • Joonkong Mak
  • Haowei Chen

Abstract

The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) tools in educational environments presents creative chances to improve mathematics education in elementary schools. This mixed-method study investigates the use of artificial intelligence tools in elementary mathematics classrooms. Complementing qualitative data from semi-structured interviews, the study had a quasi-experimental design with pre-and post-tests to measure students’ mathematical skills and a survey to explore perceptions about AI-based tool implementation. Following the employment of artificial intelligence tools, quantitative data show a notable increase in learners’ general mathematics performance and problem-solving ability. Qualitative data provide a deep insight of teachers and learners understanding about AI tools utilization in elementary mathematics classrooms and personalized experiences with expectations for learning process. Apart from several advantages, the findings highlighted few reservations about technological issues and ethical privacy concerns. However, the data analysis concludes AI tools implementation visibly enhance elementary mathematics classroom performance with the help of appropriate technology training and reasonable resources. This study advances knowledge on how best to include artificial intelligence into the classroom thereby augmenting instruction and learning support. The findings also lead to future recommendations for further research considering gender differences, bigger sample and different demographic regions.

Suggested Citation

  • Xuejing Song & Joonkong Mak & Haowei Chen, 2025. "Teachers and Learners’ Perceptions about Implementation of AI Tools in Elementary Mathematics Classes," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, May.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251334545
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251334545
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251334545
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251334545?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251334545. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.