IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251329663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Legal Judgment Prediction using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Methods: A Systematic Literature Review

Author

Listed:
  • Nasa Zata Dina
  • Sri Devi Ravana
  • Norisma Idris

Abstract

Legal Judgment Prediction (LJP) study is experiencing a growing need for automating legal judgment process to predict court decisions. In this context, the present paper provides a systematic literature review of previous LJP study, implementing machine learning (ML) as decision-making and natural language processing (NLP) to extract information from legal judgment documents. Relevant articles were found in reputable indexing databases through the search strategy, with the outcomes filtered by applying inclusion and exclusion criteria. Furthermore, six research questions were constructed to observe the datasets, topics/trends, NLP and ML methods, evaluation methods, and challenges. The LJP topic included three topics which were charge, law article, and term-of-penalty prediction. There were 21 NLP methods applied, emphasizing the highest implementation of Term Frequency-Inverse Document Frequency (TF-IDF) while the most implemented ML method was Support Vector Machine (SVM). Accuracy was the most used metric as an evaluation method. Additionally, this work emphasizes the importance of LJP and the potential use of NLP and ML. This study urges further investigation into NLP and ML, as well as practical uses of LJP. Low classification performance, low quantity of data, imbalanced dataset, data accessibility, data labeling, extraction of semantic information from natural language, expert involvement, generalizability issue, and multilingual datasets represent a few of the major problems that LJP faces, and the study is significant because it clarifies some of the major issues that LJP faces. Among those problems, low amounts of dataset and low classification performance were regarded as the most challenging tasks to deal with.

Suggested Citation

  • Nasa Zata Dina & Sri Devi Ravana & Norisma Idris, 2025. "Legal Judgment Prediction using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning Methods: A Systematic Literature Review," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251329663
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251329663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251329663
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251329663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251329663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.