IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251328066.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Effects of Diagnosis-Related Groups Policy on Medical Care System Sustainability in China

Author

Listed:
  • Qi Hu
  • Yue Lei
  • Xiangdan Piao

Abstract

The well-organized medical security system plays an important role in improving public health. This study investigates the effect of the diagnosis-related groups (DRG) policy, which is a way to control cost, on medical care services, including hospital revenue status. Based on the panel data on derived from public medical institutions in Sanming City from 2014 to 2022, the average length of stay for discharged patients, number of admissions per 100 visits, and bed utilization rate were used to measure medical services status. The difference-in-difference method was used to explore the impact of the DRG policy implementation on the overall hospital operation in medical care services in Sanming City, China. We found the DRG policy introduction has a negative effect on the average length of stay for discharged patients, emergency admissions per 100 visits, and the hospital bed occupancy rate. On the contrary, the DRG policy reduces the total medical revenue in terms of the reduced drug revenue. However, the DRG policy increases the examination and the test income, average charge per emergency visit, and drug cost per discharged patient. In sum, the introduction of the DRG policy reduces the medical care system operating cost by reducing drug revenue and bed occupancy, reducing the length of hospitalization, worsening hospital revenue, and increasing the charge for examination and test, emergency visits, and drug cost per discharge. The C-DRG policy implementation in Sanming city effected improvements in public health and overall medical care system services.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi Hu & Yue Lei & Xiangdan Piao, 2025. "The Effects of Diagnosis-Related Groups Policy on Medical Care System Sustainability in China," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251328066
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251328066
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251328066
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251328066?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251328066. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.