IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i2p21582440251327015.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Return on Education and the Gender Wage Gap in China: A Sector Perspective

Author

Listed:
  • Mingming Li
  • Xinyun Hu
  • Keyan Jin

Abstract

Much of the existing research on gender wage gaps in China is focused on a singular perspective, such as education, sector, industry, and urban–rural difference. This paper, however, discusses both returns to education and gender wage gaps from a sector perspective. Using Urban Household Survey of 2004 and 2013, this paper presents that the classic human capital theory cannot fully explain the gender wage gap and provides empirical research that multiple labor market segmentations in China exist based on segmentation theory. To investigate return difference among different education stages, we classify the Chinese education system into five categories. First, Heckman sample selection models are used to estimate male and female wages in two sectors. The study then applies quantile regressions to analyze different returns to education across wage groups. Finally, Blinder–Oaxaca decomposition is used to analyze the cause of wage gap by identifying characteristic effect and coefficient effect. Findings indicate that the gender wage gap in the private sector has shrunk but is still greater than that of the public sector; the returns to education are mostly positive for women and higher than that of men; women in the private sector with an educational background of vocational college and below have particular low returns to education; the public sector has a lower characteristic effect because of egalitarianism. The paper concludes by proposing matched policy suggestions centered around guaranteeing enrollment rate, upgrading skills, and protecting labor rights for women, especially those with low education and in the private sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Mingming Li & Xinyun Hu & Keyan Jin, 2025. "The Return on Education and the Gender Wage Gap in China: A Sector Perspective," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(2), pages 21582440251, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251327015
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251327015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251327015
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251327015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:2:p:21582440251327015. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.