IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i1p21582440251328081.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Nexus of Faculty Feedback Quality and Students’ Deep Approaches to Learning in General Education: A Mixed-Methods Study

Author

Listed:
  • Limeng Wu
  • Tong Li

Abstract

While the significant impact of faculty feedback on student learning is well recognized, the intricate link between the quality of faculty feedback and students’ deep approaches to learning, especially in the context of general education, has yet to be clarified. Employing a mixed-methods approach, this study examined the relationship between students’ perceived of quality feedback and their deep learning in general education courses. A total of 1,241 participants from a public research university took part in the survey, with follow-up interviews conducted with 20 students to validate the survey findings. The analysis indicates that encouraging, constructive, and diverse feedback significantly contributes to students’ deep approaches to learning. In contrast, timely feedback does not demonstrate a significant effect, and specific feedback is found to negatively impact deep learning. Furthermore, the study reveals variations in these effects across gender and academic disciplines. The qualitative findings corroborate the quantitative results, enhancing our comprehension of the ways faculty feedback can either facilitate or impede deep learning. These findings offer valuable directions for improving feedback practices in general education contexts.

Suggested Citation

  • Limeng Wu & Tong Li, 2025. "Nexus of Faculty Feedback Quality and Students’ Deep Approaches to Learning in General Education: A Mixed-Methods Study," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251328081
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251328081
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251328081
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251328081?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251328081. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.