IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i1p21582440251327021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Use of a Goal-Instrument Analysis Framework for Examining University Talent Cultivation Policies Within the Context of China’s Double First-Class Construction

Author

Listed:
  • Liang Bian
  • Qianqian Yang

Abstract

Policies designed to cultivate talent within universities are central to China’s strategy for reforming and improving the quality of its higher education. This study develops a goal-instrument analysis framework for a content analysis of 113 such policies. Within the context of China’s Double First-Class construction, the analysis examines the selection and use of policy instruments for university talent cultivation in Henan Province. Using a value orientation analysis, the study also explores the rationality between policy goals and the selection of policy instruments. There are three main findings: (1) policy instruments for cultivating university talent are comprehensive, but their structural allocation is imbalanced; (2) the utilization of secondary policy instruments has some level of diversification, but there the path dependence is clear; (3) the selection of policy instruments is reasonably aligned with the achievement of policy goals, but there are still noticeable biases. To optimize the policies and improve the quality of cultivated talent, three measures should be taken: scientifically allocate the structure and further strengthen the mutual promotion of various types of policy instruments; break the path dependence and further optimize the collaborative combination of secondary policy instruments; and correct existing biases and further enhance the effectiveness of policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Liang Bian & Qianqian Yang, 2025. "Use of a Goal-Instrument Analysis Framework for Examining University Talent Cultivation Policies Within the Context of China’s Double First-Class Construction," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251327021
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251327021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251327021
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251327021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251327021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.