IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i1p21582440251326389.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Comparing Linear and Nonlinear Models for Load Profile Data Using ANOVA, AIC, and BIC

Author

Listed:
  • Ilir Keka
  • Betim Çiço

Abstract

To select the best model for the relationship between the response variable and predictor variables different approaches can be used. In this paper the aim is to find the best model that gives the best forecast of the values for the line of best fit, or to find the model, which is mostly approximated to the real model. This study aims to compare linear and nonlinear models for analyzing electric data, addressing the research gap in identifying the most effective modeling approach. The research methods involved the application of Analysis of Variance (ANOVA), Akaike’s Information Criterion (AIC), and Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC) to evaluate six models, including polynomial regressions of degrees 2, 3, and 4, linear regression, multiple linear regression, and models based on interaction terms. The results revealed that nonlinear models, particularly the polynomial regression with a degree of 4 model, demonstrated superior performance in terms of goodness of fit and predictive accuracy. This model has the lowest AIC and BIC values and an adjusted R -squared of .07619 or 0.76%. The F -statistic for this model is high, at 279, which is greater than 1. The study’s main focus is on data transformation and visualization, which were essential for using the R tool to find patterns and relationships in the data. This study has a lot of potential because it provides useful information for decision-making in the energy sector.

Suggested Citation

  • Ilir Keka & Betim Çiço, 2025. "Comparing Linear and Nonlinear Models for Load Profile Data Using ANOVA, AIC, and BIC," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251326389
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251326389
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251326389
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251326389?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251326389. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.