IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i1p21582440251324763.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Key Predictors that Characterize Different Stances on Significant Global Scientific Challenges: Comparing Vaccine and Climate Change Beliefs

Author

Listed:
  • Ashlin Lee
  • Marian Sheppard
  • Claire K. Naughtin
  • Megan A. Rebuli
  • Emily Brindal

Abstract

This paper uses socioeconomic, political, psychological, information seeking and trust-related factors to characterize different beliefs on global challenges—vaccine beliefs (COVID-19) and climate change—to inform effective science and public health communications and interventions. We surveyed a sample of 1,790 Australians (73.1% female) aged 18 to over 75 years on their vaccine beliefs, perceptions of climate change risks, demographics, and various political and attitudinal beliefs. Six groups representing different levels of belief across the two challenges were identified. Canonical linear discriminant analysis identified two clear functions—Progressive Liberalism and Conspiratorial Anti-politics—emerged as explanatory for positive and negative loaded worldviews towards vaccine mandates, respectively. Willingness to act on climate change loaded strongly and positively onto both functions. The implications of this politicized worldview are discussed, including the distinction of these composites.

Suggested Citation

  • Ashlin Lee & Marian Sheppard & Claire K. Naughtin & Megan A. Rebuli & Emily Brindal, 2025. "Key Predictors that Characterize Different Stances on Significant Global Scientific Challenges: Comparing Vaccine and Climate Change Beliefs," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251324763
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251324763
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251324763
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251324763?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251324763. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.