IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i1p21582440251324746.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Exploring Teacher Assessment Conceptions in University EFL Writing Instruction

Author

Listed:
  • Qiang Guo

Abstract

Teachers’ conceptions of assessment, as a dimension of assessment literacy, have an impact on their assessment practices. Chinese teachers of English as a foreign language (EFL) writing hold a range of conceptions of assessment because of the generally poor English writing proficiency of their students, the requirement in higher education for teachers to employ formative assessment, and the need to prepare their students to pass summative exams. In this study, teachers’ conceptions of assessment in Chinese university EFL writing instruction were examined. 406 university EFL teachers participated in a survey, with the focus on seven constructs. The results indicated that, overall, Chinese university EFL teachers held mixed yet compatible conceptions of assessment, without a clear predominance of either formative or summative orientation. Three distinctive conception profiles were identified. Of the background variables examined, only age was found to significantly influence teachers’ conceptions of assessment profiles. These findings have implications for the design of classroom assessment in higher education, teacher professional learning, and assessment reform policy.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiang Guo, 2025. "Exploring Teacher Assessment Conceptions in University EFL Writing Instruction," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, March.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251324746
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251324746
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251324746
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251324746?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251324746. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.