IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i1p21582440251323338.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Analysis of Moral Discourse in Chinese and American Courtrooms

Author

Listed:
  • Min Yang
  • Ye Lin

Abstract

Moral discourse embodies interpersonal communication, social relations, responsibilities, and obligations and serves as a reasoning and lecturing tool during judicial activities. As moral imperatives are ingrained in the culture that is instilled into individuals, this study develops an analytical model for identity construction in courtroom moral narratives. The study draws eclectically on the Discourse-Historical Approach in Critical Discourse Studies, positioning theory, and proximization theory. It does so by investigating themes, discursive strategies, linguistic realizations, and identity categories in 10 trials, five selected from court sources in China and five from sources in the United States. Through exploring and interpreting historical and cultural backgrounds, participant identity construction was analyzed and differences between the two countries, with their different legal cultures, were illustrated. Contrasting the moral discourse differences in Chinese and American courtrooms, this study illuminates the complementary use of moral discourse in both courtrooms.

Suggested Citation

  • Min Yang & Ye Lin, 2025. "A Comparative Analysis of Moral Discourse in Chinese and American Courtrooms," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, March.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251323338
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251323338
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251323338
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251323338?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251323338. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.