IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i1p21582440251322564.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

From Learning Science to Computer Science: A Scientometric Review of Deeper Learning in Foreign Languages (1993–2024)

Author

Listed:
  • Zhao Wanli
  • Tang Youjun
  • Ma Xiaomei

Abstract

Deeper learning (DL) is firmly rooted in learning science and computer science. However, a dearth of review studies has probed its trajectory in DL in foreign languages(DLFL). Utilizing SSCI from the Web of Science Core Collection, we employ Citespace and Vosviewer to analyze the scientific knowledge graph of DLFL literature. Our analysis elucidates its geographical spread over time, highlights critical areas for further research, and identifies current trends in its evolution. The results show that DLFL research advances with the United States, China, the United Kingdom, Spain, and Australia ranking in the top five in terms of the number of articles published; the research hotspots focus on factors influencing DLFL, learners’ cognitive processes through language acquisition and information technology intervention in DLFL. The field of DLFL pertains to learning science, which is dedicated to enhancing learners’ performance, while computer science emphasizes utilizing advanced educational technologies as intervention tools. From learning science to computer science, both fields have followed distinct paths in their respective developments with a trend of integration, and the latter provided the former with a continuous supply of technology-mediated educational tools, including the future uses of computational thinking and ChatGPTs. As for future research directions, the development trajectory of DLFL will focus on natural language processing, cognitive neuroscience, and artificial intelligence. The findings will offer insights for future research on DLFL by enhancing the informational and computational literacy of both instructors and learners, empowering them to navigate and leverage the transformative potential of DLFL.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhao Wanli & Tang Youjun & Ma Xiaomei, 2025. "From Learning Science to Computer Science: A Scientometric Review of Deeper Learning in Foreign Languages (1993–2024)," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251322564
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251322564
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251322564
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251322564?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251322564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.