IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i1p21582440251317836.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The (Un)canniness in Identities Among Biracial Taiwanese-Vietnamese Students

Author

Listed:
  • Chi Hong Nguyen

Abstract

The identities of Taiwanese-Vietnamese students’ academic and social lives are not well-informed in the current body of research on international students in Vietnam, plus identities are often reported to be dynamic. Aiming to bridge this gap and add nuance to understanding dynamism in identities, this study explores the sense-making of these biracial students’ identities. The concepts of canniness and uncanniness in Heidegger’s phenomenology and interpretivism were used to unpack the fluidity of identities as ambiguous. In-depth interviews were conducted with 18 Taiwanese-Vietnamese students studying at nine universities in the Mekong Delta of Vietnam, offspring of the major Vietnamese bride-sending location during the 2000s. This study revealed that these biracial students hold an intersection of Taiwanese national, Taiwanese racial, and Vietnamese ethnic identities. This intersection makes them feel uncanny when they encounter ambivalence in racial, ethnic, and national identities that creates the ambiguity of their identities in legal status and social interactions. This study raises and calls for debates over a new term in the findings: quasi-international students—those with ambiguous and ambivalent racial, ethnic, and national identities—as the point of departure for future research on international student mobility and international education. Because Heidegger’s phenomenology centers around individuals’ sense-making of social processes, it is suggested that future studies focus on the influences of societal and cultural structures on biracial students’ ambiguous identities.

Suggested Citation

  • Chi Hong Nguyen, 2025. "The (Un)canniness in Identities Among Biracial Taiwanese-Vietnamese Students," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251317836
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251317836
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251317836
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251317836?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251317836. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.