IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i1p21582440251316932.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effect of “Helping Babies Breathe†Training on Ethiopian Undergraduate Midwifery Students’ Knowledge and Skills in Neonatal Resuscitation at Public Universities: A Non-Randomized Quasi-Experimental Study

Author

Listed:
  • Endalew Gemechu Sendo
  • Girum Sebsibe Teshome
  • Wegnesh Kelbessa Jirata
  • Lemi Abebe Gebrewold
  • Rahel Endalew Gemechu

Abstract

Helping Babies Breathe (HBB) is a global initiative launched by the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) in 2010, aimed at reducing neonatal mortality by addressing birth asphyxia, a leading cause of newborn deaths worldwide. The HBB training program trains providers in effectively resuscitating infants in developing countries, including Ethiopia. This study aims to examine the effects of HBB training on the knowledge and performance of undergraduate fourth-year midwifery students in neonatal resuscitation in public Ethiopian higher education institutions. The current study used a quasi-experimental study design. The study made use of the same research participants before and after the HBB Training. Pre- and post-knowledge tests, Objective structured clinical examinations (OSCEs), and a checklist for bag and mask ventilation skills checklist were used to assess the effectiveness of the HBB training. The data generated from pre and post-test results were imported into EPi Data version 4.0.2.49 and exported into SPSS version 25 for analysis. The data was correlated in nature due to its inherent source. After testing the assumptions, a paired t -test was used to examine the effect of HBB simulation training on the knowledge level of fourth-year midwifery students. The difference in the pre and post-training knowledge level of the students was declared as statistically significant at a p -value of .05. A total of 60 research participants from two public health science colleges that offer undergraduate midwifery training enrolled in this study; 54 of them received 2 days of HBB training in two phases and completed the pre- and immediate post-test course assessments. Six participants left the study for personal reasons. Of the participants in the study, 43 were female and 11 were male. The study participants were between the ages of 21 and 25, with a mean age of 22.47 years. The results demonstrated that, although before the intervention, over 25% of research participants (18; 29.63%) lacked adequate knowledge about managing birth asphyxia, all of them acquired adequate knowledge[≥80%] after the intervention. T -tests after the HBB intervention also revealed a substantial improvement in knowledge [ d ¯ + SE: 2.09 + 2.13, p

Suggested Citation

  • Endalew Gemechu Sendo & Girum Sebsibe Teshome & Wegnesh Kelbessa Jirata & Lemi Abebe Gebrewold & Rahel Endalew Gemechu, 2025. "Effect of “Helping Babies Breathe†Training on Ethiopian Undergraduate Midwifery Students’ Knowledge and Skills in Neonatal Resuscitation at Public Universities: A Non-Randomized Quasi-Experiment," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251316932
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251316932
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251316932
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251316932?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251316932. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.