Author
Listed:
- Yi-Lang Chen
- Ya-Chien Chen
Abstract
Coffee is one of the world’s most widely enjoyed beverages and is sold by numerous global coffee brands; however, few studies have investigated how brand information affects the perceived tastes of consumers. This study employed three testing methods and subjective scoring to evaluate perceived coffee tastes associated with two popular coffee brands in Taiwan. Thirty young men and thirty young women were asked to drink Starbucks and 7-Eleven Americanos and then report their perceived preference levels under three method-related conditions (i.e., blind test [BT], correct brand information [CI], and incorrect brand information [II]). The analysis of variance results revealed that all the main variables’ effects on taste scores were nonsignificant and that the gender and brand variables interactively and individually affected the scores with the employed method. The overall taste score of the men was significantly higher than that of the women under the BT condition. Under the CI condition, women had a significantly higher preference for Starbucks Americano than for 7-Eleven Americano; this result was reversed under the BT condition. These findings suggest that the perceived taste of the female participants was influenced by the assimilation effect of coffee brands; however, this phenomenon was not observed in the male participants. This outcome can be attributed to the more sensitive taste of women relative to men. These insights are valuable for understanding the behavior of coffee consumers and for crafting effective service strategies tailored to coffee brand operators.
Suggested Citation
Yi-Lang Chen & Ya-Chien Chen, 2025.
"Impact of Brand and Testing Method on Coffee Taste Perception between Genders: A Comparative Study of Two Leading Coffee Brands in Taiwan,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, January.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251316087
DOI: 10.1177/21582440251316087
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251316087. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.