IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i1p21582440251315980.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

How does cultural capital influence academic achievement in the Chinese context? A systematic literature review

Author

Listed:
  • Fenlian Xie
  • Fonny Dameaty Hutagalung

Abstract

This article reviewed how cultural capital theory is applied in China, focusing on the definition of cultural capital, the aspects of cultural capital most relevant to academic achievement, and the association between cultural capital and academic achievement. The review encompassed empirical studies published between 2001 and 2024, sourced from both English and Chinese databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, ERIC, and ProQuest, CNKI, Weipu , and Wanfang . A total of 20 quantitative and qualitative studies were included. Based on a convergent segregated approach, the article suggests that cultural capital in the Chinese context is defined as a cultural resource consisting of skills, knowledge, and dispositions that are acknowledged and rewarded in schools. In contrast to the focus on highbrow culture in Western research, parent-child reading, participation in shadow education, and English proficiency are emphasized as core aspects of cultural capital in the Chinese context. Additionally, the article finds a weaker association between cultural capital and academic achievement in China. These findings provide new insights into social reproduction in China, extending Bourdieu’s cultural capital theory, which suggests that unequal competition between classes exists within the family, to competition outside the family, such as shadow education and the acquisition of English language skills. Finally, this article discussed the applicability of lower-class cultural capital and provided directions for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Fenlian Xie & Fonny Dameaty Hutagalung, 2025. "How does cultural capital influence academic achievement in the Chinese context? A systematic literature review," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440251, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251315980
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440251315980
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440251315980
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440251315980?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440251315980. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.