IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v15y2025i1p21582440241305083.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Research on Legitimacy Building and Governance of Transportation Service Platform Ecosystem Based on Three-Party Evolutionary Game

Author

Listed:
  • Qiaohong Pan
  • Wenping Luo
  • Zongyuan Liu
  • Mengmeng Luan

Abstract

In recent years, the legitimacy issue has been considered an important challenge for digital service platform ecosystem sustainability. Accordingly, how to govern digital service platforms has been a significant research topic. Based on the transportation service platform ecosystem, this study establishes a three-party evolutionary game model considering strategies of government, platforms, and suppliers, and analyzes the corresponding governance mechanisms. The results show that the strategic choices of the government, platforms, and providers are interdependent. High tax rates, penalties, and social reputation are important influences that drive platforms and suppliers to actively build legitimacy. Moreover, the platform’s subsidies and penalties also influence the choice of provider strategies. This paper proposes that the government can actively regulate platforms which in turn promotes the platform management participants. Therefore, this study contributes to digital service platform ecosystem development and government policies.

Suggested Citation

  • Qiaohong Pan & Wenping Luo & Zongyuan Liu & Mengmeng Luan, 2025. "Research on Legitimacy Building and Governance of Transportation Service Platform Ecosystem Based on Three-Party Evolutionary Game," SAGE Open, , vol. 15(1), pages 21582440241, January.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440241305083
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241305083
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241305083
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241305083?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:15:y:2025:i:1:p:21582440241305083. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.