IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i4p21582440241301468.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Monetizing Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Power: Cost-Benefit Analysis Using Social Cost of Carbon

Author

Listed:
  • Sung-Tae Lee
  • Sun-Moon Jung

Abstract

This paper conducts a comprehensive cost-benefit analysis of nuclear energy’s contribution to climate change mitigation, with a focus on its potential to reduce the social cost of carbon (SCC). For 31 countries, we employ a four-step methodology to estimate SCC, comparing it against the lifetime costs associated with nuclear power generation. The Upstate New York case study in 2019 reveals that its three nuclear power plants could save approximately $675 million of the social cost of carbon (SCC) annually. Our SCC analyses suggest that the currently operating nuclear power plants worldwide can save the SCC, corresponding to 2.6% of the United States’ annual GDP. According to our cost-benefit analysis, among several countries that operate nuclear reactors, the US and China exhibit high environmental benefits from nuclear power, whereas other countries earn net environmental losses from it. Our study’s robust data analysis methods ensure the reliability and validity of our conclusions, enhancing the relevance of our findings for informing policy decisions. Despite variations in net benefits influenced by societal SCCs and levelized costs of energy (LCOE), nuclear energy emerges as a crucial component in transitioning to a zero-carbon grid. Our study advocates for the use of SCC analysis to incentivize the adoption of low-carbon energy sources.

Suggested Citation

  • Sung-Tae Lee & Sun-Moon Jung, 2024. "Monetizing Environmental Impacts of Nuclear Power: Cost-Benefit Analysis Using Social Cost of Carbon," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241301468
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241301468
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241301468
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241301468?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241301468. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.