IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i4p21582440241297412.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Effects of Planning Conditions on L2 Writing in Relation to Task Complexity

Author

Listed:
  • Ning Fan
  • Yingying Ma

Abstract

Researchers have been investigating the effects of different planning conditions on learners’ second language (L2) writing performance. However, whether such effects differ regarding specific planning conditions and task complexity has remained underexplored. This study examined the effects of pre-task planning (PTP) versus unpressured online planning (OLP) on L2 writing, particularly in relation to task complexity manipulated in terms of the reasoning demands. Participants were 60 low-intermediate Chinese English as a Foreign Language (EFL) learners who were divided into a PTP group and an unpressured OLP group. Each group completed two writing tasks differing in complexity manipulated as more or less reasoning demands. The participants’ texts were examined in terms of lexical and syntactic complexity, accuracy, and fluency. The results revealed that there were no significant differences between PTP and unpressured OLP in lexical and syntactic complexity. However, unpressured OLP benefited accuracy and fluency, and the benefits reached a significant level. In addition, its effects on accuracy were affected by task complexity in that it was much more beneficial to a simple task than to a complex one. For lexical and syntactic complexity and fluency, no such effects were found. The pedagogical implications and limitations of the study were discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Ning Fan & Yingying Ma, 2024. "Effects of Planning Conditions on L2 Writing in Relation to Task Complexity," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241297412
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241297412
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241297412
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241297412?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241297412. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.