IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i4p21582440241297061.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A Comparative Study of Practice Ability Development Motivation and Curriculum Adaptation for Advanced Business English Learners in a Chinese University

Author

Listed:
  • Qing Xie

Abstract

This study reports on an investigative study with 70 English majors and 39 non-English-majors in a Chinese university who were recruited using convenience sampling, on their practice ability development motivations and needs, the effectiveness of business English curriculum in practice ability development and practice-oriented curriculum adaptation suggestions, based on two-stage surveys and teacher’s participant observation. The study results generated from numerical theme calculation and response content analysis showed that although the non-English-majors were more motivated than the English-majors, both groups had an intermediate level of practice-oriented motivation. Most English-majors and non-English-majors considered the business English curriculum as effective in enhancing their practice abilities. Regarding curriculum adaptations and post-course activities, most English-majors and non-English-majors encouraged more simulation-based practice and group activities, and the integration of diverse business and trade language and knowledge development activities. The results and research process of the study can inform future research on business English curriculum development.

Suggested Citation

  • Qing Xie, 2024. "A Comparative Study of Practice Ability Development Motivation and Curriculum Adaptation for Advanced Business English Learners in a Chinese University," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, November.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241297061
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241297061
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241297061
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241297061?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241297061. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.