IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i4p21582440241292901.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Investigating Factors Responsible for More Boredom in Online Live EFL Classes

Author

Listed:
  • Wen Liu
  • Zhen-fang Xie

Abstract

Although recent years have seen a growing interest in students’ experiences of boredom in foreign language learning, scant attention has been paid to this negative emotion in online live classes. With a mixed-methods approach, this study investigated what factors were responsible for student boredom in online live classes and what made Chinese students majoring in English more bored in online live classes than in traditional in-person classes. Data were collected through a questionnaire and focus group interviews. Quantitative and qualitative data analyses revealed that the main factors responsible for this negative emotion in online live settings were teacher-centered classes, less engagement and interaction, high task challenges, monotonous and long learning activities, textbook-based activities, students’ lack of self-discipline, peer influences, the absence of emotional support, unreliable internet connection, physical fatigue, a locked-down campus, and a dormitory learning environment. Students’ greater boredom in online live settings than in-person settings arose from student-related factors, technological factors, and environment-related factors. This study sheds light on how to alleviate student boredom in foreign language learning in online live settings.

Suggested Citation

  • Wen Liu & Zhen-fang Xie, 2024. "Investigating Factors Responsible for More Boredom in Online Live EFL Classes," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241292901
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241292901
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241292901
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241292901?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241292901. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.