Author
Listed:
- Feifei Li
- Ruile Xue
- Songying Wang
- Mingyue Du
Abstract
As an important fiscal policy of local governments, local government borrowing has an increasingly prominent impact on micro-enterprises. However, there is still a lack of effective verification on whether local government debt (LGD) will affect the Environmental, Social, and Corporate Governance (ESG) performance of enterprises. This paper uses micro data of Chinese listed companies from 2011 to 2020 and LGD data at the prefecture-level city layer to test the impact and mechanism of the expansion of LGD on corporate ESG performance by establishing panel regression models and mediating effect models. The results show that the expansion of LGD significantly reduces the ESG performance of local enterprises and presents a long-term inhibitory effect. The mechanism analysis indicates that the expansion of LGD suppresses corporate ESG performance by crowding out corporate credit resources, reducing government fiscal subsidies to enterprises, thereby worsening corporate cash flow. Furthermore, the negative impact of LGD expansion on corporate ESG performance is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises, those with high leverage, high industry competition, high technological intensity, low marketization, and low financial development levels. Furthermore, the expansion of LGD mainly reduces corporate social and environmental responsibility but has no significant impact on internal governance. The inhibitory effect of LGD on ESG is not caused by publicly issued urban investment bonds but stems from non-publicly issued debts. This paper extends the research on the microeconomic consequences of LGD to the field of corporate ESG, providing insights for comprehensively assessing the risks of LGD and promoting the construction of corporate ESG.
Suggested Citation
Feifei Li & Ruile Xue & Songying Wang & Mingyue Du, 2024.
"Does the Expansion of Local Government Debt Affect the ESG Performance of Enterprises? Evidence From China,"
SAGE Open, , vol. 14(4), pages 21582440241, October.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241291307
DOI: 10.1177/21582440241291307
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:4:p:21582440241291307. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.