IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v14y2024i3p21582440241279663.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

English Foreign Language Reading Anxiety and Reading Strategies: A Positive or Negative Correlation?

Author

Listed:
  • Van T. T. Dang

Abstract

Anxiety, an affective factor, is pivotal in language learners’ success or failure. Findings pointed to its correlation with oral performance, test results, and language skills, namely listening and writing, but only a little with reading. At the current research site, a Vietnamese context, very little evaluation on reading anxiety in English foreign language learning could be found. Therefore, this investigation aimed to explore learners’ English foreign language reading anxiety levels, reading techniques used, and the correlation between foreign language reading anxiety (FLRA) and reading strategies (RS). A cross-sectional survey was conducted on 324 university students (including 152 females and 172 males) in a private educational Vietnamese context with two main data-gathering instruments: the Foreign Language Reading Anxiety Scale (FLRAS) and Survey of Reading Strategies (SORS). Results revealed a moderate level of reading anxiety among 68.5% of respondents, while 31.4% had hi- and lo-anxiety levels with the same percentage of 15.7% each. Regarding reading techniques, Problem-Solving Strategies were found to be the most favorable, and those with lo-anxiety used strategic reading more regularly than the others (hi- and mid-anxiety level groups). When it comes to the correlation between FLRA and RS, a statistically negative correlation was found. It means FLRA could decrease when RS increases. Additionally, FLRA was negatively correlated with three RS subscales. Based on the findings, several pedagogical implications were also discussed.

Suggested Citation

  • Van T. T. Dang, 2024. "English Foreign Language Reading Anxiety and Reading Strategies: A Positive or Negative Correlation?," SAGE Open, , vol. 14(3), pages 21582440241, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241279663
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440241279663
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440241279663
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440241279663?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:14:y:2024:i:3:p:21582440241279663. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.