IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i4p21582440221141699.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An Empirical Investigation of the EFL Learners Attitudes Toward the Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning

Author

Listed:
  • Eidhah Abdullah AbdulRaheem Al-Malki
  • Fahmeeda Gulnaz
  • Choudhary Zahid Javid
  • Maha Zahid Chaudhry

Abstract

Peer collaboration in small groups has increasingly been recognized as an instructional technique that promotes interactive skills, socialization, learning and achievement across a range of subjects and disciplines. The study aims to measure Saudi female EFL learners’ attitudes toward the effectiveness of cooperative learning (CL) and its impact on their social and academic skills. In the present study, the researchers utilized a quantitative research tool to collect data from the participants. A 25-item Likert-scale opinionnaire was designed with closed-ended statements to measure five variables laid down by Johnson et al. tabulated into five sections. The survey was administered to 100 Saudi female EFL learners at undergraduate level to measure their attitudes toward the effectiveness of CL. The findings of the study indicate that CL enhances EFL learners’ social skills, maximizes inter-group relations, mastery of the course content and academic achievement. It further develops EFL learners’ individual and group accountability, leadership qualities and decision-making power. It is assumed that EFL learners’ cognitive faculties can be activated and optimum results can be obtained if this interactive strategy is implemented in a structured pattern with a properly designed rubric focusing on the five essential components of CL.

Suggested Citation

  • Eidhah Abdullah AbdulRaheem Al-Malki & Fahmeeda Gulnaz & Choudhary Zahid Javid & Maha Zahid Chaudhry, 2022. "An Empirical Investigation of the EFL Learners Attitudes Toward the Effectiveness of Cooperative Learning," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(4), pages 21582440221, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:21582440221141699
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221141699
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221141699
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221141699?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:4:p:21582440221141699. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.