IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i3p21582440221123021.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

EFL Learners’ Perceptions of Integrating Computer-Based Feedback into Writing Classrooms: Evidence From Saudi Arabia

Author

Listed:
  • Suliman M. N. Alnasser

Abstract

Recently, the integration of computer-based feedback (CBF) systems, as assistive tools for instructors, into EFL writing contexts has attracted researchers’ attention. However, EFL learners’ perceptions toward such tools’ application remain under-investigated. Therefore, this study investigates EFL learners’ perceptions toward integrating CBF into writing classrooms in the Saudi higher education level. We adopted a quasi-experimental research design with a mixed-method approach for data collection and purposive sampling as sampling technique. We administered pre-questionnaires to two groups of Saudi male EFL undergraduate students undertaking an English program ( n  = 40). The experimental group’s participants developed four multiple draft essays after receiving automated feedback on each essay (i.e., the treatment), after which post-questionnaires were administered to measure shift in their perceptions. The findings suggest that majority of participants held positive views on this tool, and some of their views positively changed at a statistically significant level after practice. However, we identified few student concerns regarding these systems. Thus, although integrating such tools into writing classes provides learners with positive experiences and encourages their engagement in learning, instructors must ensure the students’ access to functional devices and appropriate Internet connections.

Suggested Citation

  • Suliman M. N. Alnasser, 2022. "EFL Learners’ Perceptions of Integrating Computer-Based Feedback into Writing Classrooms: Evidence From Saudi Arabia," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(3), pages 21582440221, September.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221123021
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221123021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221123021
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221123021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Akrum Helfaya, 2019. "Assessing the use of computer-based assessment-feedback in teaching digital accountants," Accounting Education, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 69-99, January.
    2. Christian Burkhart & Andreas Lachner & Matthias Nückles, 2020. "Assisting students’ writing with computer-based concept map feedback: A validation study of the CohViz feedback system," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 15(6), pages 1-20, June.
    3. repec:igg:jmbl00:v:13:y:2021:i:2:p:73-95 is not listed on IDEAS
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Apostolou, Barbara & Dorminey, Jack W. & Hassell, John M., 2020. "Accounting education literature review (2019)," Journal of Accounting Education, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:3:p:21582440221123021. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.