IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/sagope/v12y2022i2p21582440221089960.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

The Clinical Nursing Competency Assessment System of Ghana: Perspectives of Key Informants

Author

Listed:
  • Oboshie Anim-Boamah
  • Christmal Dela Christmals
  • Susan Jennifer Armstrong

Abstract

It is essential to ensure that nurses are well trained and competent enough to provide safe and quality healthcare because of the critical role they play in the health systems globally. It is against this backdrop that Ghana instituted nursing licensing examination which includes clinical competency assessment. This qualitative exploratory descriptive study sought to explore and describe the perspectives of key informants on the clinical nursing competency assessment in Ghana. A total of 20 purposively selected key informants (nurse educators, nurse clinicians, and nurse managers) were interviewed. Data was analyzed using thematic content analysis. Although the intention of the clinical competency examination conducted by the nursing council is to ensure that only competent nurses are licensed to practice in Ghana, there are inherent issues such as manipulation of examiners, poor training of examiners, unstandardized assessment process, and inadequate resource which compromises the intent of the process. The nursing council admitted to not being aware of some of the challenges found in this study and will work towards improving the quality, validity, reliability, and fairness of the examination system. It is essential that the council institute quality improvement processes, including independent research into the examination process, to continually improve on the process because other countries within the sub-region try to benchmark their nursing licensing examination on that of Ghana.

Suggested Citation

  • Oboshie Anim-Boamah & Christmal Dela Christmals & Susan Jennifer Armstrong, 2022. "The Clinical Nursing Competency Assessment System of Ghana: Perspectives of Key Informants," SAGE Open, , vol. 12(2), pages 21582440221, April.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221089960
    DOI: 10.1177/21582440221089960
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/21582440221089960
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/21582440221089960?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Nahed Alquwez & Jonas Preposi Cruz & Farhan Alshammari & Ebaa Marwan Felemban & Joseph U. Almazan & Regie B. Tumala & Hawa M. Alabdulaziz & Fatmah Alsolami & John Paul Ben T. Silang & Hanan M. M. Tork, 2019. "A multi‐university assessment of patient safety competence during clinical training among baccalaureate nursing students: A cross‐sectional study," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(9-10), pages 1771-1781, May.
    2. Amanda Lambie & Kelly Schwend & Andrea Scholl, 2015. "Utilization of the Nursing Process to Foster Clinical Reasoning During a Simulation Experience," SAGE Open, , vol. 5(4), pages 21582440156, November.
    3. Clint Douglas & Catriona Booker & Robyn Fox & Carol Windsor & Sonya Osborne & Glenn Gardner, 2016. "Nursing physical assessment for patient safety in general wards: reaching consensus on core skills," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 25(13-14), pages 1890-1900, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Marion Tower & Bernadette Watson & Alison Bourke & Emma Tyers & Anne Tin, 2019. "Situation awareness and the decision‐making processes of final‐year nursing students," Journal of Clinical Nursing, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 28(21-22), pages 3923-3934, November.
    2. David Luna-Aleixos & Irene Llagostera-Reverter & Ximo Castelló-Benavent & Marta Aquilué-Ballarín & Gema Mecho-Montoliu & Águeda Cervera-Gasch & María Jesús Valero-Chillerón & Desirée Mena-Tudela & Lau, 2022. "Development and Validation of a Meta-Instrument for Nursing Assessment in Adult Hospitalization Units (VALENF Instrument) (Part I)," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 19(22), pages 1-15, November.
    3. Jan Neugebauer & Valérie Tóthová & Jitka Doležalová, 2021. "Use of Standardized and Non-Standardized Tools for Measuring the Risk of Falls and Independence in Clinical Practice," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 18(6), pages 1-11, March.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:sagope:v:12:y:2022:i:2:p:21582440221089960. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.