IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v240y2026i2p768-789.html

Mis-specification analysis of the degradation model based on Wiener process and random coefficient regression model

Author

Listed:
  • Fengfei Wang
  • Shengjin Tang
  • Xiaoyan Sun
  • Chuanqiang Yu
  • Xiaosheng Si

Abstract

Various types of Wiener processes have been studied quite extensively to apply for highly reliable products’ degradation modeling. The simple random coefficient regression (RCR) model also demonstrates a relatively robust ability in predicting lifetime and remaining useful life (RUL). Therefore, this paper investigates the differences between the RCR model and the Wiener process in terms of lifetime estimation and RUL prediction, providing a reference for selecting an appropriate model. Specifically, considering the importance of parameters estimation for model mis-specification analysis, the analytical expressions of unbiased parameters estimation based on RCR models are first derived. Then, based on this, the modeling differences between the RCR model and the Wiener process under the same degradation data are analyzed, and the probability density function (PDF) distributions of estimated lifetime and predicted RUL are provided to illustrate the impact of model mis-specification specification. Finally, results from several numerical examples and case studies show that under the same degradation data with up and down fluctuations, the results predicted by the Wiener process are more conservative than those of the RCR model, making it suitable for high-risk areas, while the RCR model is suitable for cost-sensitive applications.

Suggested Citation

  • Fengfei Wang & Shengjin Tang & Xiaoyan Sun & Chuanqiang Yu & Xiaosheng Si, 2026. "Mis-specification analysis of the degradation model based on Wiener process and random coefficient regression model," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 240(2), pages 768-789, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:240:y:2026:i:2:p:768-789
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X251369095
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X251369095
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X251369095?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:240:y:2026:i:2:p:768-789. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.