IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v240y2026i2p508-526.html

FMEA-resilience framework for planning maintenance of medical devices using fuzzy logic and Simulink

Author

Listed:
  • Abbas Al-Refaie
  • Abdulrahman Qasaymeh
  • Natalija Lepkova

Abstract

Hospitals are compelled to mitigate the frequency and impact of potential failure modes of medical devices, develop an effective maintenance planning strategy, and improve patient satisfaction. This study, therefore, developed a framework that combines resilience principles with fuzzy failure mode and effects analysis (FFMEA) for maintenance planning using the risk Iso-surface method, fuzzy matching sets, and Simulink. The proposed framework used the FFMEA approach to estimate the risk index ( RI ), resilience assessment to obtain the resilience index ( RE ), and developed an RI - RE plot to be used for maintenance planning. The RI estimation of failure modes involved the identification, analysis, and assessment of risk components; severity, occurrence, and detection, utilizing fuzzy logic and matching sets. The RE was measured by four resilience potentials via a survey consisting of 51 questions and then evaluated using fuzzy logic. Finally, the RI - RE plot was divided into 12 zones to determine adequate maintenance strategies for all failure modes. A real case study, which consisted of 22 failure modes for six intensive care unit medical devices, was presented for validation. Results revealed that the developed framework effectively identified adequate resilient maintenance policies with suitable maintenance actions for all failure modes. In conclusion, the framework is found to be valuable and can support maintenance engineering in developing effective maintenance planning for medical devices under fuzzy evaluations and unexpected failure modes.

Suggested Citation

  • Abbas Al-Refaie & Abdulrahman Qasaymeh & Natalija Lepkova, 2026. "FMEA-resilience framework for planning maintenance of medical devices using fuzzy logic and Simulink," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 240(2), pages 508-526, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:240:y:2026:i:2:p:508-526
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X251400975
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X251400975
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X251400975?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:240:y:2026:i:2:p:508-526. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.