IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v240y2026i2p419-437.html

Multi-objective optimization of maintenance policies for unmanned aerial vehicle swarms

Author

Listed:
  • Qixin Zhang
  • Xiangbin Yan
  • Rui Yan
  • Rui Peng
  • Shaomin Wu
  • Wensen Li

Abstract

The proliferation of unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) swarms presents critical challenges to system-level reliability and safety. Traditional maintenance strategies, designed for single assets, are fundamentally inadequate for the systemic complexities and multifaceted risks of swarm operations. This study addresses this gap by developing a multi-objective optimization framework to derive optimal maintenance policies for heterogeneous UAV swarms. We formulate the problem to simultaneously minimize maintenance cost, maximize mission reliability, and minimize a composite operational risk encompassing both crash and hazardous material release. The framework distinguishes between nodal and non-nodal UAV roles and employs the Non-dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm II (NSGA-II) to explore the complex trade-off space. The framework is validated through numerical experiments against a heuristic benchmark, yielding significant results. Optimized policies reduce injury risk by more than tenfold compared to traditional methods, while simultaneously doubling mission reliability. Furthermore, the analysis reveals a distinct “efficiency frontier†for safety investment, providing a novel, data-driven tool for managerial decision-making. Ultimately, this research delivers a holistic, risk-informed framework that bridges the gap between theoretical optimization and the practical challenges of safe, reliable, and cost-effective swarm operation, offering actionable guidance for tailoring maintenance strategies to specific risk tolerance levels.

Suggested Citation

  • Qixin Zhang & Xiangbin Yan & Rui Yan & Rui Peng & Shaomin Wu & Wensen Li, 2026. "Multi-objective optimization of maintenance policies for unmanned aerial vehicle swarms," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 240(2), pages 419-437, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:240:y:2026:i:2:p:419-437
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X251407272
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X251407272
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X251407272?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:240:y:2026:i:2:p:419-437. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.