Author
Listed:
- Akanksha Chaturvedi
- Sanjay K Chaturvedi
- Monalisa Sarma
Abstract
Power converters are essential in various applications such as aerospace, photovoltaic systems, smart grids, and electric vehicles etc. Component failures in these converters pose significant risks to overall system reliability, especially in safety-critical applications. Existing fault classification methods focus mostly on single faults within individual components but overlook the complex interactions of multiple faults in real-world scenarios. This paper addresses the challenge of identifying and classifying multiple faults in power converters using cascading failures. By analyzing the interconnections between components, we identify components that are prone to degrade simultaneously. This approach simplifies the fault classification process by highlighting these dependencies. Leveraging a multi-sensor fusion approach, incorporating data like RMS output voltage, input current, peak-to-peak voltage ripple, efficiency, and frequency domain analysis to construct a comprehensive dataset tailored for fault classification. A 1D-CNN is used to classify multiple faults, demonstrating its efficacy across various converter circuits including boost, flyback, and SEPIC converters. Visualization analysis further elucidates the inner workings of the proposed methodology 1D-CNN model using t-SNE. Classification accuracy reached 96.80%, 98.00%, and 95.00% for the respective converter circuits, demonstrating the potential of proposed approach in fault diagnosis of converters. The proposed methodology enables early detection of fault propagation within the converter circuits, efficient maintenance scheduling, minimizing downtime and extending the operational lifespan of critical industrial systems.
Suggested Citation
Akanksha Chaturvedi & Sanjay K Chaturvedi & Monalisa Sarma, 2025.
"Cascading effects detection and multiple components faults classification in power converters based on multi-sensor fusion approach and 1D-convolutional neural network,"
Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 239(6), pages 1364-1383, December.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:6:p:1364-1383
DOI: 10.1177/1748006X251327864
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:6:p:1364-1383. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.