IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v239y2025i5p1221-1237.html

Mission reliability modeling based on extended RQR chain considering process scheme robustness for multistate manufacturing systems

Author

Listed:
  • Tianyu Feng
  • Yihai He
  • Jiayang Li
  • Rui Shi

Abstract

Process scheme robustness is the core of the “Method†in 5M1E (Man, Machine, Material, Method, Measurement, and Environment), which is the foundation of manufacturing quality and reliability assurance. However, previous studies frequently overlooked the significant impact of the coupling between the process scheme and process parameter robustness on the formation and degradation of mission reliability. Therefore, a novel method for modeling mission reliability in a multistate manufacturing system is proposed. This method is based on an extended RQR chain (manufacturing system Reliability, operational process Quality, and the produced product Reliability) while considering process scheme robustness. First, the connotation of process scheme robustness and mission reliability in multistate manufacturing systems is described. Second, an extended RQR chain (ERQR chain) model is established, which considers the influence of process scheme robustness on the high-quality operation of the manufacturing system. Third, based on the established ERQR chain model, an integrated mission reliability model considering process scheme robustness for multistate manufacturing systems is established. Specifically, the process scheme robustness is evaluated from three perspectives: manufacturing cost, operation time, and product qualification rate. Finally, a hydraulic pump is used as an example to verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.

Suggested Citation

  • Tianyu Feng & Yihai He & Jiayang Li & Rui Shi, 2025. "Mission reliability modeling based on extended RQR chain considering process scheme robustness for multistate manufacturing systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 239(5), pages 1221-1237, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:5:p:1221-1237
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X241283993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X241283993
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X241283993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:5:p:1221-1237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.