IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v239y2025i5p1024-1040.html

Quantitative analysis of uncertainty in field data and calibration method for estimating life distribution parameters

Author

Listed:
  • Kyungmin Yang
  • Dooyoul Lee

Abstract

In this study, to quantitatively evaluate the uncertainty of data input, electronic data, and handwritten data were compared and analyzed. Specifically, failure data of aircraft hydraulic actuators were used for failure trend and pattern analysis, descriptive statistical analysis, statistical lifetime analysis, and Bayesian network (BN) analysis. The field data used in weapons system reliability analysis uses electronic data from the Defense Logistics Integrated Information System (DELIIS). However, several issues have been identified in the quality of electronic data. To obtain meaningful results from reliability analysis, efforts are needed to reduce uncertainty in data input and improve quality. The analysis revealed that the quality of the electronic data was approximately 69% compared to the handwritten data. To address this issue, an integrated model based on Bayes’ theorem was presented. The integrated model increased the level of reliability analysis results by calibrating the parameters of the life distribution by combining the advantages of the two data types. The presented model can be continuously supplemented through Bayesian updates and is expected to be applicable to other weapon systems for which handwritten data exists.

Suggested Citation

  • Kyungmin Yang & Dooyoul Lee, 2025. "Quantitative analysis of uncertainty in field data and calibration method for estimating life distribution parameters," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 239(5), pages 1024-1040, October.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:5:p:1024-1040
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X241302922
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X241302922
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X241302922?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:5:p:1024-1040. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.