IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v239y2025i3p515-534.html

A Bayesian agent-based model and software for wildfire safe evacuation planning and management

Author

Listed:
  • Mohammad Pishahang
  • Andres Ruiz-Tagle
  • Marilia A. Ramos
  • Enrique Lopez Droguett
  • Ali Mosleh

Abstract

Efficient evacuation of wildfire-threatened communities is a pressing challenge. A reliable evacuation planning and execution requires a comprehensive understanding of the diverse and interdependent physical, social, and behavioral components, and advanced, yet easy to use decision support system. This paper proposes the Wildfire Safe Egress (WiSE) framework, which integrates the fire dynamics, human behavior, and traffic model to predict the chance of safe egress by any given community during a wildfire evacuation. WISE framework presents a unified dependency diagram and workflow offering consistent granularity between sub-models and creates comparable evacuation scenarios. A human behavior model is proposed to predict the community decision making and action based on their socio-demographic vulnerability profile. An agent-based stochastic approach generates evacuation departure times. The travel times are calculated through a congestion-informed traffic simulation. Finally, a Bayesian Network is used to combine the sub-models and to predict community safety (probability of successful evacuation) via probabilistic inference based on the integrated model. A proof-of-concept software implementation of the WiSE framework is also presented. To demonstrate the model and platform capabilities the evacuation of the entire city of Paradise during the California Camp Fire 2018 is simulated. The simulation results are qualitatively validated by the firefighters who served in this disaster. A sensitivity analysis of the parameters is performed to compare several evacuation scenarios and provide insights for future wildfire evacuation plannings.

Suggested Citation

  • Mohammad Pishahang & Andres Ruiz-Tagle & Marilia A. Ramos & Enrique Lopez Droguett & Ali Mosleh, 2025. "A Bayesian agent-based model and software for wildfire safe evacuation planning and management," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 239(3), pages 515-534, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:3:p:515-534
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X241259215
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X241259215
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X241259215?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wong, Stephen D & Broader, Jacquelyn C & Shaheen, Susan A, 2020. "Can Sharing Economy Platforms Increase Social Equity for Vulnerable Populations in Disaster Response and Relief? A Case Study of the 2017 and 2018 California Wildfires," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1rm9b3r8, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    2. Ruiz-Tagle, Andres & Lopez-Droguett, Enrique & Groth, Katrina M., 2022. "A novel probabilistic approach to counterfactual reasoning in system safety," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 228(C).
    3. Soga, Kenichi & Comfort, Louise & Zhao, Bingyu & Lorusso, Paola & Soysal, Sena, 2021. "Integrating Traffic Network Analysis and Communication Network Analysis at a Regional Scale to Support More Efficient Evacuation in Response to a Wildfire Event," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt1z913878, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    4. Khakzad, Nima, 2019. "Modeling wildfire spread in wildland-industrial interfaces using dynamic Bayesian network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 189(C), pages 165-176.
    5. Patriarca, Riccardo & Ramos, Marilia & Paltrinieri, Nicola & Massaiu, Salvatore & Costantino, Francesco & Di Gravio, Giulio & Boring, Ronald Laurids, 2020. "Human reliability analysis: Exploring the intellectual structure of a research field," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    6. Mustafa Anil Yazici & Kaan Ozbay, 2008. "Evacuation Modelling in the United States: Does the Demand Model Choice Matter?," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(6), pages 757-779, March.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ding Wang & Kaan Ozbay & Zilin Bian, 2021. "Modeling and Analysis of Optimal Strategies for Leveraging Ride-Sourcing Services in Hurricane Evacuation," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(8), pages 1-22, April.
    2. Ekanem, Nsimah & Mosleh, Ali & Shen, Song-Hua & Ramos, Marilia, 2024. "Phoenix–A model-based human reliability analysis methodology: Data sources and quantitative analysis procedure," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 248(C).
    3. Piyapong Suwanno & Chaiwat Yaibok & Noriyasu Tsumita & Atsushi Fukuda & Kestsirin Theerathitichaipa & Manlika Seefong & Sajjakaj Jomnonkwao & Rattanaporn Kasemsri, 2023. "Estimation of the Evacuation Time According to Different Flood Depths," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(7), pages 1-23, April.
    4. Gonzalo Wandosell & María C. Parra-Meroño & Alfredo Alcayde & Raúl Baños, 2021. "Green Packaging from Consumer and Business Perspectives," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(3), pages 1-19, January.
    5. Daniel Béland & Alex Jingwei He & M Ramesh, 2022. "COVID-19, crisis responses, and public policies: from the persistence of inequalities to the importance of policy design [The impact of COVID-19 on gender equality]," Policy and Society, Darryl S. Jarvis and M. Ramesh, vol. 41(2), pages 187-198.
    6. Liu, Zhichen & Li, Ying & Zhang, Zhaoyi & Yu, Wenbo, 2022. "A new evacuation accessibility analysis approach based on spatial information," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 222(C).
    7. You, Qidong & Guo, Jianbin & Zeng, Shengkui & Che, Haiyang, 2024. "A dynamic Bayesian network based reliability assessment method for short-term multi-round situation awareness considering round dependencies," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 243(C).
    8. Cheng, Tingting & Veitch, Erik A. & Utne, Ingrid Bouwer & Ramos, Marilia A. & Mosleh, Ali & Alsos, Ole Andreas & Wu, Bing, 2024. "Analysis of human errors in human-autonomy collaboration in autonomous ships operations through shore control experimental data," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 246(C).
    9. Misuri, Alessio & Landucci, Gabriele & Cozzani, Valerio, 2021. "Assessment of risk modification due to safety barrier performance degradation in Natech events," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    10. Ayşe Polat & Hüseyin Onur Tezcan, 2024. "Investigation of Trip Decisions for an Earthquake: A Case Study in Elazığ, Türkiye," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(20), pages 1-20, October.
    11. Ye Zheng & Yazhou Xie & Xuejiao Long, 2021. "A comprehensive review of Bayesian statistics in natural hazards engineering," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 108(1), pages 63-91, August.
    12. Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Peiji & Leng, Chunjiang & Pan, Meilin & Wang, Shufei & Qiu, Jiulu & Zhang, Qing & Zhong, Wei, 2025. "Blast loading prediction in a typical urban environment based on 3D direction-encoded Bayesian neural network," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 264(PB).
    13. Caratozzolo, Vincenzo & Misuri, Alessio & Cozzani, Valerio, 2022. "A generalized equipment vulnerability model for the quantitative risk assessment of horizontal vessels involved in Natech scenarios triggered by floods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 223(C).
    14. Yulei Song & Xuedong Yan, 2016. "A Method for Formulizing Disaster Evacuation Demand Curves Based on SI Model," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(10), pages 1-21, October.
    15. Maturana, Marcos Coelho & Martins, Marcelo Ramos & Frutuoso e Melo, Paulo Fernando Ferreira, 2021. "Application of a quantitative human performance model to the operational procedure design of a fuel storage pool cooling system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    16. Lan, Meng & Zhu, Jiping & Lo, Siuming, 2021. "Hybrid Bayesian network-based landslide risk assessment method for modeling risk for industrial facilities subjected to landslides," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 215(C).
    17. Podofillini, Luca & Reer, Bernhard & Dang, Vinh N., 2021. "Analysis of recent operational events involving inappropriate actions: influencing factors and root causes," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 216(C).
    18. Khakzad, Nima & Cozzani, Valerio, 2020. "Special issue: Quantitative assessment and risk management of Natech accidents," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    19. Lu, Xin & Zeng, Shengkui & Guo, Jianbin & Deng, Wei & He, Mingjun & Che, Haiyang, 2025. "An integrated method of extended STPA and BN for safety assessment of man-machine phased-mission system," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    20. Prosper K. Anyidoho & Rachel A. Davidson & Linda K. Nozick & Jennifer Trivedi & Sarah E. DeYoung & Tricia Wachtendorf, 2025. "Can visits to certain businesses help predict evacuation decisions in real time?," Natural Hazards: Journal of the International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, Springer;International Society for the Prevention and Mitigation of Natural Hazards, vol. 121(6), pages 7533-7550, April.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:3:p:515-534. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.