IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v239y2025i3p443-458.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integrated testability modeling method of complex systems for fault feature selection and diagnosis strategy optimization

Author

Listed:
  • Xinyun Zhu
  • Jianzhong Sun
  • Zichen Yan
  • Yutong Xu

Abstract

The efficacy of system fault diagnosis is intricately linked with the testability design of the system, particularly in intricate systems encompassing numerous components exhibiting diverse failure modes. However, current research shows a dearth of effective testability models and algorithms for generating diagnostic strategies in multi-valued attribute systems (MVAS) with uncertainty. To address this, the present paper introduces a novel method for testability modeling for complex systems. This approach incorporates signal features in lieu of raw sensor signals within the testability modeling process and accounts for the uncertainties surrounding test outcomes. The context of complex MVAS, characterized by inherent uncertainty, the paper proposes a novel method for constructing a four-value dependency matrix (D-matrix). Furthermore, the paper presents a novel sequential diagnosis strategy optimization approach based on a heuristic evaluation function for the multivalued D-matrix with uncertainty. The proposed methodology has been rigorously validated using a real-world case study involving an aero-engine fuel metering device system. Comparative experiments show that the proposed method can achieve better diagnostic performance in the shortest time.

Suggested Citation

  • Xinyun Zhu & Jianzhong Sun & Zichen Yan & Yutong Xu, 2025. "Integrated testability modeling method of complex systems for fault feature selection and diagnosis strategy optimization," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 239(3), pages 443-458, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:3:p:443-458
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X241271884
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X241271884
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X241271884?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:239:y:2025:i:3:p:443-458. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.