IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v238y2024i6p1302-1329.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Optimal defense resource allocation against cyber-attacks in distributed generation systems

Author

Listed:
  • Huadong Mo
  • Xun Xiao
  • Giovanni Sansavini
  • Daoyi Dong

Abstract

The deployment of advanced information and communication technologies necessitates considering new security threats, such as distributed denial of service attacks and malware, which can fault power generators and feeders and exacerbate power outages in distributed generation systems (DGS). Existing cyber-security studies fail to validate the attacker–defender game model between operators and hackers or provide a DGS model that accounts for realistic characteristics and operations. Furthermore, current game models may be infeasible for large-scale systems and are not robust against uncertainties owing to the use of metaheuristic algorithms. To overcome these gaps, this study quantified the result of a game using the contest success function and estimated the parameters of this function based on real-world evidence: the dataset of cyber crime incidents from Advisen, US. The DGS management was optimized using the power flow model considering the scenario-based uncertainty stemming from cyber-attacks. A three-stage attack+defend–defend–attack framework is proposed to optimize attack–defense resource allocation using the cooperative game and ϵ -subgradient method. The results for IEEE 4, 13, 34, 123 and 342 test node feeders show that the proposed framework is applicable to large-scale systems and robust to various types of cyber-attacks. The proposed model and algorithms further enhance the DGS performance under uncertainties by protecting the entire grid or only critical nodes according to the defenders’ objectives.

Suggested Citation

  • Huadong Mo & Xun Xiao & Giovanni Sansavini & Daoyi Dong, 2024. "Optimal defense resource allocation against cyber-attacks in distributed generation systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 238(6), pages 1302-1329, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:6:p:1302-1329
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X231196259
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X231196259
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X231196259?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:238:y:2024:i:6:p:1302-1329. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.