IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v235y2021i6p1102-1117.html

A fault diagnostic system based on Petri nets and gray relational analysis for train–ground wireless communication systems

Author

Listed:
  • Yining Zeng
  • Rongxing Duan
  • Tao Feng
  • Shujuan Huang
  • Jiejun He

Abstract

The system structure of train–ground wireless communication systems (TWCSs) is extremely complicated due to the use of fault tolerant technology to improve their performance. This complex structure raises several challenges in fault diagnosis for TWCSs, such as epistemic uncertainty, dynamic fault behaviors, and common cause failure (CCF). A fault diagnostic system is proposed to deal with these challenges based on Petri nets and gray relational analysis in this paper. Specifically, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process is used to evaluate the failure data of components to handle epistemic uncertainty. Furthermore, the dynamic fault tree of TWCSs is established and converted into a generalized stochastic Petri net to calculate several reliability parameters used for fault diagnosis. Besides, a β factor model is employed to resolve the problem of CCF in TWCSs. In addition, Birnbaum importance measure (BIM), risk achievement worth (RAW) and test cost are considered comprehensively to obtain the optimal diagnostic sequence using an improved gray relational analysis. Finally, a numerical example is presented to demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed fault diagnostic system.

Suggested Citation

  • Yining Zeng & Rongxing Duan & Tao Feng & Shujuan Huang & Jiejun He, 2021. "A fault diagnostic system based on Petri nets and gray relational analysis for train–ground wireless communication systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(6), pages 1102-1117, December.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:6:p:1102-1117
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X211006993
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X211006993
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X211006993?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Assaf, T. & Dugan, J.B., 2008. "Diagnosis based on reliability analysis using monitors and sensors," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 93(4), pages 509-521.
    2. Ajith Tom James & O. P. Gandhi & S. G. Deshmukh, 2018. "Fault diagnosis of automobile systems using fault tree based on digraph modeling," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 9(2), pages 494-508, April.
    3. Ge, Daochuan & Lin, Meng & Yang, Yanhua & Zhang, Ruoxing & Chou, Qiang, 2015. "Quantitative analysis of dynamic fault trees using improved Sequential Binary Decision Diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 289-299.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Zhiqiang Liu & Wenbo Zhu & Hongzhou Zhang & Shengjin Wang & Lu Fang & Weijun Hong & Hua Shao & Guopeng Wang, 2020. "Reliability evaluation of dynamic face recognition systems based on improved Fuzzy Dynamic Bayesian Network," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(3), pages 15501477209, March.
    2. Yu, Shui & Wang, Zhonglai & Zhang, Kewang, 2018. "Sequential time-dependent reliability analysis for the lower extremity exoskeleton under uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 45-52.
    3. Zhou, Siwei & Li, Zhao & Xiang, Jianwen, 2025. "Reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees with Priority-AND gates using conditional binary decision diagrams," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    4. Farzin Salehpour-Oskouei & Mohammad Pourgol-Mohammad, 2018. "Sensor placement determination in system health monitoring process based on dual information risk and uncertainty criteria," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(1), pages 65-81, February.
    5. Piriou, Pierre-Yves & Faure, Jean-Marc & Lesage, Jean-Jacques, 2017. "Generalized Boolean logic Driven Markov Processes: A powerful modeling framework for Model-Based Safety Analysis of dynamic repairable and reconfigurable systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 163(C), pages 57-68.
    6. Xu, Jintao & Gui, Maolei & Ding, Rui & Dai, Tao & Zheng, Mengyan & Men, Xinhong & Meng, Fanpeng & Yu, Tao & Sui, Yang, 2023. "A new approach for dynamic reliability analysis of reactor protection system for HPR1000," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 234(C).
    7. Lin, Zhixian & Tao, Longlong & Wang, Shaoxuan & Yong, Nuo & Xia, Dongqin & Wang, Jianye & Ge, Daochuan, 2024. "A subset simulation analysis framework for rapid reliability evaluation of series-parallel cold standby systems," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    8. Gascard, Eric & Simeu-Abazi, Zineb, 2018. "Quantitative Analysis of Dynamic Fault Trees by means of Monte Carlo Simulations: Event-Driven Simulation Approach," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 180(C), pages 487-504.
    9. Hamzeh Soltanali & Mehdi Khojastehpour & José Torres Farinha & José Edmundo de Almeida e Pais, 2021. "An Integrated Fuzzy Fault Tree Model with Bayesian Network-Based Maintenance Optimization of Complex Equipment in Automotive Manufacturing," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(22), pages 1-21, November.
    10. Haiyue Yu & Xiaoyue Wu, 2021. "A method for transformation from dynamic fault tree to binary decision diagram," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(3), pages 416-430, June.
    11. Mohamed Alawadhi & Jumah Almazrouie & Mohammed Kamil & Khalil Abdelrazek Khalil, 0. "Review and analysis of the importance of autonomous vehicles liability: a systematic literature review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 0, pages 1-23.
    12. Mohamed Alawadhi & Jumah Almazrouie & Mohammed Kamil & Khalil Abdelrazek Khalil, 2020. "Review and analysis of the importance of autonomous vehicles liability: a systematic literature review," International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management, Springer;The Society for Reliability, Engineering Quality and Operations Management (SREQOM),India, and Division of Operation and Maintenance, Lulea University of Technology, Sweden, vol. 11(6), pages 1227-1249, December.
    13. Mi, Jinhua & Li, Yan-Feng & Yang, Yuan-Jian & Peng, Weiwen & Huang, Hong-Zhong, 2016. "Reliability assessment of complex electromechanical systems under epistemic uncertainty," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 1-15.
    14. Zhou, Siwei & Ye, Luyao & Xiong, Shengwu & Xiang, Jianwen, 2022. "Reliability analysis of dynamic fault trees with Priority-AND gates based on irrelevance coverage model," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    15. Wang, Shaoxuan & Ge, Daochuan & Yong, Nuo & Sun, Ming & Yao, Yuantao & Tao, Longlong & Xia, Dongqin & Wang, Feipeng & Yu, Jie, 2025. "Rapid computation of survival signature for dynamic fault tree based on sequential binary decision diagram and multidimensional array," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 253(C).
    16. Lu, Lu & Xu, Zhengguo & Wang, Wenhai & Sun, Youxian, 2013. "A new fault detection method for computer networks," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 114(C), pages 45-51.
    17. Chemweno, Peter & Pintelon, Liliane & Muchiri, Peter Nganga & Van Horenbeek, Adriaan, 2018. "Risk assessment methodologies in maintenance decision making: A review of dependability modelling approaches," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 173(C), pages 64-77.
    18. Wang, Shaoxuan & Yao, Yuantao & Ge, Daochuan & Lin, Zhixian & Wu, Jie & Yu, Jie, 2023. "Reliability evaluation of standby redundant systems based on the survival signatures methods," Reliability Engineering and System Safety, Elsevier, vol. 239(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:6:p:1102-1117. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.