IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v235y2021i4p711-728.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An integrated risk index accounting for epistemic uncertainty in probability risk assessment

Author

Listed:
  • Zhiguo Zeng
  • Tasneem Bani-Mustafa
  • Roger Flage
  • Enrico Zio

Abstract

In this paper, we present an integrated framework for quantifying epistemic uncertainty in probabilistic risk assessment. Three types of epistemic uncertainty, that is, completeness, structural and parametric uncertainties, are considered. A maturity model is developed to evaluate the management of these epistemic uncertainties in the model building process. The impact of epistemic uncertainty on the result of the risk assessment is, then, estimated based on the developed maturity model. Then, an integrated risk index is defined to reflect the epistemic uncertainty in the risk assessment results. An indifference method is developed to evaluate the index based on the maturity of epistemic uncertainty management. A case study concerning a nuclear power plant is shown to demonstrate the applicability of the overall modelling framework.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhiguo Zeng & Tasneem Bani-Mustafa & Roger Flage & Enrico Zio, 2021. "An integrated risk index accounting for epistemic uncertainty in probability risk assessment," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(4), pages 711-728, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:4:p:711-728
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X20968954
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X20968954
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X20968954?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:4:p:711-728. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.