IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v235y2021i4p627-636.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A risk assessment methodology of aluminum dust explosion for polishing process based on laboratory tests

Author

Listed:
  • Haipu Bi
  • Xiaolong Xie
  • Kaimin Wang
  • Yujie Cao
  • Hui Shao

Abstract

The secondary dust explosion ignited by the primary explosion energy often causes greater damage to the just destroyed carrier. Therefore, the study of explosion risk as well as the risk reduction effect with suppression is key guard against the secondary and derivative explosions. A novel risk assessment methodology is presented based on Monte Carlo theory for numerically fitting pressure’s uncertainty changes and Crystal ball simulation for calculating explosion risk and its distribution probability of hazardous explosive dust. Taking the aluminum dust of a polishing process as an example, the fitted results show that the tested explosion pressure in laboratory presents the shape of lognormal distribution with average pressure of 0.27 MPa on the condition of 500 g/m 3 aluminum dust with median particle diameter at 35 μm. The simulated results show that the risk possibility of myringorupture injury, pneumorrhagia injury, and structure damage all approaches 100% because of the high explosion pressure considering the potential percentage of injury or damage at 50%. However, the risk possibility reduces to 14.27%, 0.13%, and 42.05% with suppressants of ammonium dihydrogen phosphate at 10%, respectively. The proposed method of risk assessment for dust explosion and its suppression provides scientific basis for strategy optimization of dust explosion protection and safe production of fine explosive dust related industry.

Suggested Citation

  • Haipu Bi & Xiaolong Xie & Kaimin Wang & Yujie Cao & Hui Shao, 2021. "A risk assessment methodology of aluminum dust explosion for polishing process based on laboratory tests," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(4), pages 627-636, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:4:p:627-636
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X20987377
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X20987377
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X20987377?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:4:p:627-636. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.