IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v235y2021i1p17-32.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

An allision risk model for passing vessels and offshore oil and gas installations on the Norwegian Continental Shelf

Author

Listed:
  • Martin Hassel
  • Ingrid Bouwer Utne
  • Jan Erik Vinnem

Abstract

This article presents a new risk model for estimating the probability of allision risk (the impact between a ship under way and a stationary installation) from passing vessels on the Norwegian Continental Shelf (NCS). Offshore petroleum operators on the NCS are required by the Norwegian Petroleum Safety Authority (PSA) to perform risk assessments to estimate the probability of impacts between ships and offshore installations, both for field related and passing (merchant) vessels. This has typically been done using the aging industry standard COLLIDE risk model, but this article presents a new risk model based on a Bayesian Belief Network (BBN) that can replace the old COLLIDE model for passing vessels. The new risk model incorporates a wider range of risk influencing factors (RIFs) and enables a holistic and detailed analysis of risk factors, barrier elements and dependencies. Even though the risk of allision with passing vessels is very small, the potential consequences can be critical. The new risk model is more transparent and provides a better understanding of the mechanisms behind allision risk calculations. The results from the new model are aligned with industry expectations, indicating an overall satisfactory performance. The article discusses several key elements, such as the use of expert judgement to estimate RIFs when no empirical data is available, model sensitivity, and a comparative assessment of the new risk model to the old COLLIDE model.

Suggested Citation

  • Martin Hassel & Ingrid Bouwer Utne & Jan Erik Vinnem, 2021. "An allision risk model for passing vessels and offshore oil and gas installations on the Norwegian Continental Shelf," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 235(1), pages 17-32, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:1:p:17-32
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X20957481
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X20957481
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X20957481?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:235:y:2021:i:1:p:17-32. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.