IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v233y2019i4p537-552.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Sensor selection for fault diagnostics using performance metric

Author

Listed:
  • J Reeves
  • R Remenyte-Prescott
  • J Andrews

Abstract

As technology advances, modern systems are becoming increasingly complex, consisting of large numbers of components, and therefore large numbers of potential component failures. These component failures can result in reduced system performance, or even system failure. The system performance can be monitored using sensors, which can help to detect faults and diagnose failures present in the system. However, sensors increase the weight and cost of the system, and therefore, the number of sensors may be limited, and only the sensors that provide the most useful system information should be selected. In this article, a novel sensor performance metric is introduced. This performance metric is used in a sensor selection process, where the sensors are chosen based on their ability to detect faults and diagnose failures of components, as well as the effect the component failures have on system performance. The proposed performance metric is a suitable solution for the selection of sensors for fault diagnostics. In order to model the outputs that would be measured by the sensors, a Bayesian Belief Network is developed. Sensors are selected using the performance metric, and sensor readings can be introduced in the Bayesian Belief Network. The results of the Bayesian Belief Network can then be used to rank the component failures in order of likelihood of causing the sensor readings. To illustrate the proposed approach, a simple flow system is used in this article.

Suggested Citation

  • J Reeves & R Remenyte-Prescott & J Andrews, 2019. "Sensor selection for fault diagnostics using performance metric," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 233(4), pages 537-552, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:4:p:537-552
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X18804690
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X18804690
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X18804690?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:233:y:2019:i:4:p:537-552. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.