IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v232y2018i3p227-247.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A methodology for model-based verification of safety contracts and performance requirements

Author

Listed:
  • Elena Gómez-Martínez
  • Ricardo J Rodríguez
  • Clara Benac-Earle
  • Leire Etxeberria
  • Miren Illarramendi

Abstract

The verification of safety requirements becomes crucial in critical systems where human lives depend on their correct functioning. Formal methods have often been advocated as necessary to ensure the reliability of software systems, albeit with a considerable effort. In any case, such an effort is cost-effective when verifying safety-critical systems. Often, safety requirements are expressed using safety contracts, in terms of assumptions and guarantees. To facilitate the adoption of formal methods in the safety-critical software industry, we propose a methodology based on well-known modelling languages such as the unified modelling language and object constraint language. The unified modelling language is used to model the software system while object constraint language is used to express the system safety contracts within the unified modelling language. In the proposed methodology a unified modelling language model enriched with object constraint language constraints is transformed to a Petri net model that enables us to formally verify such safety contracts. The methodology is evaluated on an industrial case study. The proposed approach allows an early safety verification to be performed, which increases the confidence of software engineers while designing the system.

Suggested Citation

  • Elena Gómez-Martínez & Ricardo J Rodríguez & Clara Benac-Earle & Leire Etxeberria & Miren Illarramendi, 2018. "A methodology for model-based verification of safety contracts and performance requirements," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(3), pages 227-247, June.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:3:p:227-247
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X16667328
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X16667328
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X16667328?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:3:p:227-247. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.