IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v232y2018i1p92-104.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Integration of scheduled structural health monitoring with airline maintenance program based on risk analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Jianzhong Sun
  • Dan Chen
  • Chaoyi Li
  • Hongsheng Yan

Abstract

The aerospace industry is striving to reduce the aircraft operating costs while maintaining required safety level. Emerging technologies such as the structural health monitoring to reduce long-term maintenance cost and increase aircraft availability are promoted by the manufacturers. To successfully integrate the structural health monitoring technology into the current maintenance process of modern commercial aviation, a clear definition of the structural-health-monitoring-based maintenance operational concept and the system level requirements is required. This article proposed a structural health monitoring operational concept and the associated maintenance cost modeling and risk assessment methods for the implementation of the structural health monitoring in commercial aviation industry. The developed methodology provides a tool to determine the optimal scheduled structural health monitoring inspection interval and repair decision thresholds for approved scheduled structural health monitoring task. A simulated case study is carried out to demonstrate the structural health monitoring operational concept and how an optimal maintenance strategy can be determined using the proposed methodology. Preliminary results show that the integration of the structural health monitoring into the existing maintenance process can reduce the maintenance cost compared to that of the current practice using the traditional Non-Destructive Evaluation (NDE) techniques while maintaining the risk below an acceptable level.

Suggested Citation

  • Jianzhong Sun & Dan Chen & Chaoyi Li & Hongsheng Yan, 2018. "Integration of scheduled structural health monitoring with airline maintenance program based on risk analysis," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 232(1), pages 92-104, February.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:1:p:92-104
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X17742777
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X17742777
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X17742777?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:232:y:2018:i:1:p:92-104. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.