IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v231y2017i6p680-690.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

A methodology for assessing the reliability and security of cascade reservoir systems

Author

Listed:
  • Ying Tian
  • Qingwen Ren
  • Yin Yang
  • Yao Xiong

Abstract

The scale of cascade reservoir systems is increasing rapidly along with the development of hydroelectric projects in these systems. Related security problems are receiving increasing public attention. However, no security evaluation method for this type of system can be found in the literature. Reliability is an essential indicator to measure system security. Because of the brittleness, complexity, and polymorphism of the system, a Bayesian network and set pair analysis theory–based methodology suitable for the reliability analysis of cascade reservoir systems is suggested in this article. First, the topological structure of the Bayesian network is constructed, and the brittle effect is measured using the powerful probabilistic inference capability of the Bayesian network. Then, the probability distribution of each subsystem is obtained, and probabilities of the system in all states are integrated using set pair analysis theory. Furthermore, the composite reliability is proposed as a generic reliability representation for cascade reservoir systems. On this basis, through constructing a composite probability vector and composite probability matrix, the Bayesian network and set pair analysis theory–based reliability measure models for both subsystems and the whole system are proposed. Finally, the effectiveness and practicability of the method described above are verified by introducing an example application. The results show that this research provides a theoretical basis and practical method for assessing the reliability and security of cascade reservoir systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Ying Tian & Qingwen Ren & Yin Yang & Yao Xiong, 2017. "A methodology for assessing the reliability and security of cascade reservoir systems," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 231(6), pages 680-690, December.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:231:y:2017:i:6:p:680-690
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X17726945
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X17726945
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X17726945?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:231:y:2017:i:6:p:680-690. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.