IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v228y2014i2p189-199.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Testability demonstration test planning based on sequential posterior odds test method

Author

Listed:
  • Chao Wang
  • Jing Qiu
  • Guan-jun Liu
  • Yong Zhang

Abstract

Testability is a new critical characteristic of equipment, and testability demonstration test plays an important role in assuring the designed testability levels. As a result of the complex structure and higher cost of the current equipment, a reasonable testability demonstration test plan can both guarantee the desired testability level and effectively decrease the test cost. This article considers the testability demonstration test planning with the binomial distribution. The sequential posterior odds test method that combines Bayesian method and sequential probability ratio test method is used to form a sequential decision process by calculating the Bayes factor and making judgment according to the test result sequentially. With a sequential decision criterion, the test result space is divided into three subspaces, based on which a Bayes factor threshold calculation method is presented according to the restriction parameters and prior probability density function of the testability index. Operation characteristic and average sampling number are compared among the classical method, sequential probability ratio test method and the sequential posterior odds test method, which shows that with nearly the same operation characteristic, sequential posterior odds test method has smaller average sampling number than sequential probability ratio test method and classical method. The impact of prior parameters on the sequential posterior odds test method is analyzed, and the results indicate that the sequential posterior odds test method can perform well with a range of prior parameters. Physical testability demonstration tests are carried out to verify the features of sequential posterior odds test and sequential probability ratio test methods. The result indicates that with the same restriction parameters and test condition, the sample size of sequential posterior odds test is smaller than the sample size of sequential probability ratio test as a result of the introduction of prior information.

Suggested Citation

  • Chao Wang & Jing Qiu & Guan-jun Liu & Yong Zhang, 2014. "Testability demonstration test planning based on sequential posterior odds test method," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 228(2), pages 189-199, April.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:228:y:2014:i:2:p:189-199
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X13508108
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X13508108
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X13508108?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:228:y:2014:i:2:p:189-199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.