IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/risrel/v227y2013i4p405-410.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Assessment of national reference values for railway safety: a statistical treatment

Author

Listed:
  • Jens Braband
  • Hendrik Schäbe

Abstract

We discuss the decision procedure used in the Commission Decision for national reference values. According to the safety directive, every year seven safety indicators have to be computed for every member state. In the decision, a fixed procedure has been presented for computing the safety indicators and to assess whether there is a possible deterioration in safety. In the safety assessment, the decision depends on a weighted sum in place of an arithmetic mean. It is then of interest how such a decision procedure would behave and what would be the advantages and disadvantages of the particular method. In this article, we study a slightly simplified version of the procedure by two means. First, we analyze the weighted sum and derive its characteristic as efficiency. Moreover, we compare it via a spread with an ordinary sample mean. We support the theoretical results with the help of a simple simulation study in order to estimate failure probabilities of the first and second kinds. In particular, we construct such alternative distributions that the decision procedure cannot distinguish.

Suggested Citation

  • Jens Braband & Hendrik Schäbe, 2013. "Assessment of national reference values for railway safety: a statistical treatment," Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 227(4), pages 405-410, August.
  • Handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:227:y:2013:i:4:p:405-410
    DOI: 10.1177/1748006X13495003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1748006X13495003
    Download Restriction: no

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/1748006X13495003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:227:y:2013:i:4:p:405-410. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.