Author
Listed:
- H H de Jong
- F Preti
- G W H van Es
Abstract
This paper outlines a proposal for a framework of indicators developed with the aim to improve European safety performance monitoring of Air Navigation Services. The extension of scope from the usual choice of Air Traffic Management to Air Navigation Services has been made to address the complication that Air Traffic Management is a different service from Communication, Navigation, and Surveillance, but intimately connected with it. The framework considers the potential influence of Air Navigation Services on air traffic safety, and it uses accidents, their causal/contributing factors, and incidents related to these services as source data for the indicators. Those occurrence categories are considered for which Air Navigation Services have the potential to improve risk. This approach is independent of the notion of a service's contribution to occurrences, which is normally used, but which suffers from a considerable degree of subjectivity. In the data flows from air traffic operations to safety performance indicators, weak links are human incident reporting, varying proportions of incidents actually investigated sufficiently well plus different ways to perform the investigations, and differences in interpretation in providing overviews of the resulting safety data on the level of States. In view of these weaknesses, conditions are developed to prevent data of insufficient quality from being used. The paper mentions a number of aspects to consider when using the indicators. Before drawing conclusions, statistical significance and the existence of reporting bias need to be assessed. The paper finishes with a discussion of the relation of the framework with existing targets and indicates how the framework could support deriving appropriate targets and performance of safety assessments.
Suggested Citation
H H de Jong & F Preti & G W H van Es, 2008.
"A framework of indicators for the potential influence of Air Navigation Services on air traffic safety in Europe,"
Journal of Risk and Reliability, , vol. 222(1), pages 57-78, March.
Handle:
RePEc:sae:risrel:v:222:y:2008:i:1:p:57-78
DOI: 10.1243/1748006XJRR72
Download full text from publisher
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:risrel:v:222:y:2008:i:1:p:57-78. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.