IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/sae/revdev/v30y2025i1_supplps50-s65.html

Structural Change and the Agrarian Question in the Marxian Tradition

Author

Listed:
  • R. Ashwath

Abstract

The economists’ interest in the concept of structural change itself dates back to the tradition of classical political economy. Ideas related to structural change in the face of agrarian transitions can be found in classical economists as early as Quesnay and the Physiocrats. The analysis of the agrarian transition to capitalism (and socialism) as part of the overall structural change in the economic system has been a matter of interest for Marx and the Marxists. The Marxian agrarian question discourses, including Marx’s study of primitive accumulation, Engels’s peasant question, Lenin’s and Kautsky’s work on the development of capitalism in manufacturing and industry, and the post-Soviet debates on the transition to socialism, have the mechanics of structural change at their centre. This study reconstructs the ideas on structural change in the canonical texts of the agrarian question discourse in a thematic manner and constructs an analytical framework of structural change and agrarian transition in the Marxian tradition. This study is an attempt to survey and rearticulate the Marxian agrarian question from a history of economic thought standpoint, focusing on the mechanics of structural change.

Suggested Citation

  • R. Ashwath, 2025. "Structural Change and the Agrarian Question in the Marxian Tradition," Review of Development and Change, , vol. 30(1_suppl), pages 50-65, May.
    • Handle: RePEc:sae:revdev:v:30:y:2025:i:1_suppl:p:s50-s65
    DOI: 10.1177/09722661251332494
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/09722661251332494
    Download Restriction: no
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1177/09722661251332494?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tony Aspromourgos, 2005. "The invention of the concept of social surplus: Petty in the Hartlib Circle," The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 12(1), pages 1-24.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Sergio Cesaratto, 2024. "Surplus Approach and Institutions: Where Sraffa Meets Polanyi," Journal of Economic Issues, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 58(3), pages 988-1010, July.
    2. Sergio Cesaratto & Stefano Di Bucchianico, 2020. "The surplus approach, Polanyi and institutions in economic anthropology and archaeology," Department of Economics University of Siena 828, Department of Economics, University of Siena.
    3. Sergio Cesaratto & Stefano Di Bucchianico, 2021. "The Surplus Approach, the Polanyian Tradition, and Institutions in Economic Anthropology and Archaeology," Annals of the Fondazione Luigi Einaudi. An Interdisciplinary Journal of Economics, History and Political Science, Fondazione Luigi Einaudi, Torino (Italy), vol. 55(1), pages 185-216, June.
    4. Sergio Cesaratto, 2019. "Heterodox economics and Economic Anthropology: reflections prompted by two books," Department of Economics University of Siena 807, Department of Economics, University of Siena.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:sae:revdev:v:30:y:2025:i:1_suppl:p:s50-s65. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: SAGE Publications (email available below). General contact details of provider: .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.